Akamai distributed content delivery network uses the approach described in the paper. A ring has a fixed-length. The value of k is determined by the desired variance. Consistent hashing algorithm vary in how easy and effective it is to add servers with different weights. The algorithm works by using a hash of the key as the seed for a random number generator. Ring hashing still has some problems. You can’t use it for distributing keys among a set of memcached instances where one of them might crash — there’s no way to remove the crashed node from the list of possible destinations. As you can see, there is no perfect consistent hashing algorithm. It’s now used by Cassandra, Riak, and basically every other distributed system that needs to distribute load over servers. I have a set of keys and values. I needed a compatible Go implementation and came across this problem. This article will use all three interchangeably.). We mention other positive aspects of our Web caching system, such as fault tolerance and load balancing, in Section 5. In comparison to the algorithm of Karger et al., jump Let’s use the above example and place them on the hash ring. Consistent Hashing is a distributed hashing scheme that operates independently of the number of servers or objects in a distributed hash table by assigning them a position on an abstract circle, or hash ring. consistent hash in C#. Here’s a simple implementation taken from groupcache (slightly modified for clarity): To add the list of nodes to the ring hash, each one is hashed m.replicas times with slightly different names ( 0 node1, 1 node1, 2 node1, …). Lookups get slower. The algorithm effectively produces a lookup table that allows finding a node in constant time. Since there will be multiple servers, how do we determine which server will store a key? They all have trade-offs. To find an object by key, hash the key and get the index and looks for the key in the bucket at that index. For 1000 nodes, this is 4MB of data, with O(log n) searches (for n=1e6) all of which are processor cache misses even with nothing else competing for the cache. Jump is a bit tricky, but it can be done. This allows servers and objects to scale without affecting the overall system. It works particularly well when the number of machines storing data may change. For example, a hash function can be used to map random size strings to some fixed number between 0 … N. Given any string it will always try to map it to any integer between 0 to N. Suppose N is 100. Consistent hashing Our system is based on consistent hashing,a scheme developed in a previous theoretical paper [6]. Perform modulo operation on hash of the key to get the array index. For example, if server S3 is removed then, all keys from server S3 will be moved to server S1 but keys stored on server S1 and S2 are not relocated. It then uses the random numbers to “jump forward” in the list of buckets until it falls off the end. Consistent hashing helps us to distribute data across a set of nodes/servers in such a way that reorganization is minimum. The factor for a number of replicas is also known as weight, depends on the situation. Suppose a number of employees kept growing and it becomes difficult to store all employee information in a hash table which can fit on a single computer. Jump Hash and Multi-Probe consistent hashing are trickier to use and maintain their existing performance guarantees. Consistent hashing forms a keyspace, which is also called continuum, as presented in the illustration. Using consistent hashing for load balancing seems like an appealing idea. Similarly, if we need to remove a server (say, because it crashed), then the keys should be evenly distributed across the remaining live servers. Consistent Hashing là một chiến thuật hiệu quả cho việc phân chia distributed caching systems và DHT. In 1997, the paper “Consistent Hashing and Random Trees: Distributed Caching Protocols for Relieving Hot Spots on the World Wide Web” was released. The algorithm was actually included in the 2011 release of the Guava libraries and indicates it was ported from the C++ code base. Non-cryptographic hash functions like xxHash, MetroHash or SipHash1–3 are all good replacements. For two overviews, see. Hash functions are used in combination with the hash table. A Fast, Minimal Memory, Consistent Hash Algorithm John Lamping, Eric Veach Google Abstract We present jump consistent hash, a fast, minimal memory, consistent hash algorithm that can be expressed in about 5 lines of code. You need to know these types and also C’s promotion rules:The answer is this:And the reason is because of C’s arithmetic promotion rules and because the 40.0 c… The first operation is to create the ring. If the number of concurrent users of your application doesn’t run into a few hundred million then an In-memory data store is a good solution. There’s a detailed post detailing how it was added to HAProxy at Vimeo, (with a cameo by Yours Truly :). 一般的数据库进行horizontal shard的方法是指,把 id 对 数据库服务器总数 n 取模,然后来得到他在哪台机器上。这种方法的缺点是,当数据继续增加,我们需要增加数据库服务器,将 n 变为 n+1 时,几乎所有的数据都要移动,这就造成了不 consistent。 For our testing environment, we set up a cache view using 100 caches and created 1000 copies of each cache on the unit circle. Consistent Hashing — Load balancer decides which instance to send the request to. Load balancing is a huge topic and could easily be its own book. Luckily, there’s a paper that solves this. First, choose a hash function to map a key (string) to an integer. The main limitation is that it only returns an integer in the range 0..numBuckets-1. 08/23/2019 ∙ by John Chen, et al. To be specific, your design should include these functions: put(key, value): Insert a (key, value) pair into the HashMap.If the value already exists in the HashMap, update the value. Then we will see distributed hashing and what are the problems it faces and how consistent hashing fixes those problems. (The standard deviation of buckets is 0.000000764%, giving a 99% confidence interval of 0.99999998 to1.00000002). Consistent hashing does not solve the problem of looking things up completely by itself. This tends to rule out cryptographic ones like SHA-1 or MD5. In hash table, we use fixed size array of N to map hash code of all keys. The 99% confidence interval for bucket sizes is 0.76 to 1.28 of the average load (i.e., total keys / number of servers). My library is also slightly faster because it doesn’t use MD5 for hashing. Assuming 50 data centers across different regions. It’s fast and splits the load evenly. Suppose three servers are S1, S2, and S3, each will have an equal number of keys. As a point of comparison, to have the equivalent peak-to-mean ratio of 1.05 for Ring Hash, you need 700 ln n replicas per node. Each call to GetNode() costs only 1 or 2 macro-seconds. Some strategies use full node replication (i.e, having two full copies of each server), while others replicate keys across the servers. Each existing algorithm has its own specification: MD5 produces 128-bit hash values. Hash function can be used to hash object key (which is email) to an integer number of fixed size. This allows servers and objects to scale without affecting the overall system. What if one of the queue partitions goes down? What is the ‘copyWith()’ Operation in Flutter? This is a serious implementation that can work with over 10000 back-end servers, while many others cann't support more than 100 … Jump Hash provides effectively perfect load splitting at the cost of reduced flexibility when changing the shard counts. For a peak-to-mean-ratio of 1.05 (meaning that the most heavily loaded node is at most 5% higher than the average), k is 21. Consistent Hashing is a distributed hashing scheme that operates independently of the number of servers or objects in a distributed hash table by assigning them a position on a hash ring. With a tricky data structure you can get the total lookup cost from O(k log n) down to just O(k). … This comes with significant memory cost. Consistent Hashing can be described as follows: 1. In 2014, Google released the paper “A Fast, Minimal Memory, Consistent Hash Algorithm” known as “Jump Hash”. You need to be careful to avoid landing on the same node for the replica key too. It only solves the problem of knowing where keys are most likely to be located. A better way to think of Jump Hash is as providing a shard number, not a server name. In a nutshell, consistent hashing is a solution for the rehashing problem in a load distribution process. ∙ Rice University ∙ 0 ∙ share . The number of locations is no longer fixed, but the ring is considered to have an infinite number of points and the server nodes can be placed at random locations on this ring. To lookup the server for a given key, you hash the key and find that point on the circle. Suppose we want to add a server S4 as a replacement of S3 then we need to add labels S40 S41 … S49. The server location for almost all keys changed, not only for the keys from S3. Searches in the bucket are linear but a properly size hashed table will have a small number of objects per bucket resulting in constant time access. Linked list:If we will use linked list to store employee records then worst-case time for insert will be O(1) and search and delete will be O(n). (This is a great way to shard a set of locks or other in-memory data structure.). This allows servers and objects to scale without affecting the overall system. This paper described the approach used by Akamai in their distributed content delivery network. It’s also available as a standalone package. This hashing strategy, multiplying an incoming key by a prime number, is actually relatively common. For ring hash you use the next nodes you pass on the circle; for multi-probe you use the next closest. The table is effectively a random permutation of the nodes. One of the primary goals was lookup speed and low memory usage as compared with ring hashing or rendezvous hashing. The loop executes O(ln n) times, faster by a constant amount than the O(log n) binary search for Ring Hash, and made faster even still by the fact that the computation is done entirely in a few registers and doesn’t pay the overhead of cache misses. This is known as rehashing problem. Your hash function should be fast. It is based on a ring (an end-to-end connected array). This reduces the load variance among servers. My implementation uses the tricky data structure. Jump Hash is also fast. Vladimir Smirnov talks about some different trade-offs in replication strategy during his talk about Graphite Metrics Storage at Booking.com. Design a HashMap without using any built-in hash table libraries. Similar things happen if we add a server. It may be the fastest consistent hashing in C#. Rendezvous you take the next highest (or lowest). One approach would be to scale all node counts by some amount, but this increases both memory and lookup time. Making Configurable Angular Feature Modules Using Strategy Pattern. Is there a way to have flexible ring resizing and low variance without the memory overhead? If there is a request for john@example.com, then server number will be S2 ( 89 modulo 2 = 1) and it will be a cache miss and that object will be again fetched from the origin and stored in S2. index = hash(key) modulo N where N is the size of array. So instead of server labels S1, S2 and S3, we will have S10 S11…S19, S20 S21…S29 and S30 S31…S39. The downside is that it’s hard to avoid the O(n) lookup cost of iterating over all the nodes. Here is an awesome video on what, why and how to cook delicious consistent hashing. Here, the goal is to assign objects (load) to servers (computing nodes) in a way that provides load balancing while at the same time dynamically adjusts to the addition or removal of servers. The idea is that you hash the node and the key together and use the node that provides the highest hash value. What is “hashing” all about? Basically, it maps keys and values into the same hash ring circle, it can be implemented via a … You may have seen a “points-on-the-circle” diagram. Then you scan forward until you find the first hash value for any server. To evenly distribute the load among servers when a server is added or removed, it creates a fixed number of replicas ( known as virtual nodes) of each server and distributed it along the circle. Consistent Hashing is quite useful when dealing with the cache distributed issue in a dynamic environment (The servers keep adding/removing) compares with the Mod-Hashing. The catch? With a small number of vnodes, different servers could be assigned wildly different numbers of keys. If you have N servers, you hash your key with the hash function and take the resulting integer modulo N. This setup has a number of advantages. It represents the resource requestors (which we shall refer to as ‘requests’ from now on, for the purpose of this blog post) and the server nodes in some kind of a virtual ring structure, known as a hashring. This could be memcached, Redis, MySQL, whatever. For example, server = hash(key) modulo N where N is the number of servers. This study mentioned for the first time the term consistent hashing. There are many others I haven’t covered here. Hash function and Array:Here is where hash function and hash table comes to rescue which provides constant time for all three operations. One of the popular ways to balance load in a system is to use the concept of consistent hashing. In this case, the minimum value on the circle is 0 and the maximum value is 100. The paper has a more complete explanation of how it works and a derivation of this optimized loop. Some algorithms have straightforward ways to choose multiple nodes for fallback or replication. A method, system, computer-readable storage medium and apparatus for balanced and consistent placement of resource management responsibilities within a multi-computer environment, such as a cluster, that are both scalable and make efficient use of cluster resources are provided. consistent hashing. I want to distribute the keys across the servers so I can find them again. It’s a trick question: you can’t answer it in isolation. Merriam-Webster defines the noun hash as “ For full details, see the description in chapter 20, “Load Balancing in the Datacenter”. Increasing the number of replicas to 1000 points per server reduces the standard deviation to ~3.2%, and a much smaller 99% confidence interval of 0.92 to 1.09. We compare our system to other Web caching systems in Section 4. Then for example, for any string hash function will always return a value between 0 to 100. The basic idea is that each server is mapped to a point on a circle with a hash function. Another early attempt at solving the consistent hashing problem is called rendezvous hashing or “highest random weight hashing”. In the ideal case, one-third of keys from S1 and S2 will be reassigned to S4. This sort of variability makes capacity planning tricky. The two downsides is that generating a new table on node failure is slow (the paper assumes backend failure is rare), and this also effectively limits the maximum number of backend nodes. Now the objects keys adjacent to S3X labels will be automatically re-assigned to S1X and S2X. Here’s a problem. Consistent hashing is an amazing tool for partitioning data when things are scaled horizontally. These extra points are called “virtual nodes”, or “vnodes”. And once I had this sorted out for my go-ketama implementation, I immediately wrote my own ring hash library (libchash) which didn’t depend on floating point round-off error for correctness. That year saw two works published: These cemented consistent hashing’s place as a standard scaling technique. My implementation optimizes the multiple hashing by pre-hashing the nodes and using an xorshift random number generator as a cheap integer hash function. For clients in a choosing which set of backends to connect to, Google’s SRE Book outlines an algorithm called “deterministic subsetting”. This is not an in-depth analysis of consistent hashing as a concept. Hopefully you didn’t just skip down to the bottom of the article and ignore all the caveats and tradeoffs that each consistent hashing function has. As the keys are distributed across servers, the load is checked and a node is skipped if it’s too heavily loaded already. Here’s an implementation taken from github.com/dgryski/go-rendezvous. Consistent hashing gave birth to Akamai, which to this day is a major player in the Internet (market cap ˇ$10B), managing the Web presence c2015{2016, Tim Roughgarden and Gregory Valiant. Revisiting Consistent Hashing with Bounded Loads. A similar approach is described in this blog post from Amazon on “shuffle sharding”. It can also be tricky to use with node weights. Like most hashing schemes, consistent hashing assigns a set of items to buck-ets so that each bin receives roughly the same number of items. But depending on the algorithm this can end up no better than random assignment which leads to unbalanced distribution. More recently, consistent hashing has been repurposed I needed a compatible Go implementation and came across this problem.What’s the Go equivalent of this line of C?It’s a trick question: you can’t answer it in isolation. With 100 replicas (“vnodes”) per server, the standard deviation of load is about 10%. So far so good. It’s also very cheap to compute. Consistent Hashing. Yes they are well distributed but they are also too expensive to compute — there are much cheaper options available. The hash values are added to the m.nodes slice and the mapping from hash value back to node is stored in m.hashMap. Like everything else in this post, choosing a replication strategy is filled with trade-offs. Objects (and their keys) are distributed among several servers. This can increase memory usage quite considerably. Ketama is a memcached client that uses a ring hash to shard keys across server instances. Not quite. Let’s dive into it. But ideally the output range of hash functions are very large and it will be impractical and waste of memory to store objects in array. In short — consistent hashing is the algorithm that helps to figure out which node has the key. This kind of setup is very common for in-memory caches like Memcached, Redis etc. Consistent hashing solves the problem of rehashing by providing a distribution scheme which does not directly depend on the number of servers. consistent hashing basic. Consistent Hashing is one of the most asked questions during the tech interview and this is also one of the widely used concepts in the distributed system, caching, databases, and etc. Finally the m.nodes slice is sorted so we can use a binary search during lookup. Suppose our hash function output range in between zero to 2**32 or INT_MAX, then thi… Consistent Hashing, a .Net/C# implementation. Consistent hashing is a special kind of hashing which uses a hash function which changes minimally as the range of hash functions changes. According to consistent hashing rule, bob@example.com and mark@example.com are on server S2, smith@example.com and adam@example.com are on server S3 and alex@example.com and john@example.com are on server S1. Make jump hash provides effectively perfect load splitting at the upper end the... Of jump hash ” to avoid the O ( N ) lookups, the minimum value on the that! The ideas to seep into the popular consciousness N ) space ( one entry per )... They were only assigned to S1 and S2 over servers a replication strategy his. Thuật hiệu quả cho việc phân chia distributed caching systems in Section 5 how consistent as... Servers with different weights jump forward ” in the illustration the entry at that index.... Forms a keyspace, which is used for constant time for all three interchangeably. ) will dig existing. Replication is using the consistent hash to shard a set of nodes/servers in such a that! May have seen a “ points-on-the-circle ” diagram network load balancer s hashed into an integer it then consistent hashing medium random. Location for almost all keys and see how it looks like remapped when a server S4 as a standard technique. More ) nodes for a random permutation of the Guava libraries and indicates it was ported from the code. The range setup is very common for in-memory caches like memcached, Redis, MySQL, whatever means doesn... Items to buckets is removed, rather than optimal entry per node ) and. Cook delicious consistent hashing is a common data structure for the keys from S1 and S2 initial. To an integer in the Datacenter ” provides arbitrary bucket addition and removal of nodes, this is to a., but there is a strategy for dividing up keys/data between multiple machines balancing, Section... Depends on the number of keys number, not a server S4 a. Cryptographic ones like SHA-1 or MD5, you hash the key together and the... A special kind of hashing which uses a hash function which changes minimally as the range... Repurposed consistent hashing made one thing a lot easier: replicating data across a of. Them again xxHash, MetroHash or SipHash1–3 are all good replacements the C++ in the illustration distributed! During his talk about Graphite Metrics storage at Booking.com weight, depends on circle! System, such as fault tolerance and load balancing is a huge topic and easily. Delicious consistent hashing medium hashing by Cassandra, Riak etc until you find the first time the term consistent hashing increase! A way to have flexible ring resizing and low variance without the memory and... Hashing the key is stored in server Si balancing, in Section 4 changes. The time to hash the node it came from no longer able to accept request. 100 replicas ( “ vnodes ” ) per server, never between two old servers and array: here where! As you can see, there is one problem when server S3 is removed or added then the key stored. Not a server name per node ), and basically every other distributed system that needs to distribute over... Numbers to “ jump forward ” in the illustration better than random which... Will describe the main concepts scan forward until you find the index and check the bucket set does not a! Point on a Pentium II 266MHz chip và DHT from Amazon on “ shuffle sharding ” number. 99 % confidence interval of 0.99999998 to1.00000002 ) i can find them again node that provides the highest value... We mention other positive aspects of our Web caching system, such as hashing... And now what you ’ ve all been waiting for also known as “ maglev hashing.! Node to query to reduce load variance … S39 must be removed released maglev: fast! Just the time to hash the key strategy is filled with trade-offs than optimal other nice things about ring or... Standard scaling technique to distribute the keys from S3 there are many others i ’! Chiến thuật hiệu quả cho việc phân chia distributed caching may be the consistent... Lookup table that allows finding a node in constant time for all three operations binary search lookup... Algorithm was actually included in the bucket set does not directly depend on the same integer the other nice about... Fast, Minimal memory, consistent hash algorithm ” known as a hash function will always return a between! Hashing on a Pentium II 266MHz chip it falls off the end is,! Mention other positive aspects of our Web caching systems in Section 5 developed in a previous theoretical paper [ ]... Indicates it was ported from the 9 “ old ” servers be assigned wildly different numbers keys. Perfect key distribution as weight, depends on the circle ; for Multi-Probe use... Server for a given key is stored on, it can also tricky. Which changes minimally as the range operation on hash of the paper strategy. Standard scaling technique replication strategy is filled with trade-offs Riak etc data may change came... Function will always return a value between 0 to 100 when the number keys... Which provides constant time for all three interchangeably. ) is good, but this increases both memory lookup... Replication is to ensure data survives single or multiple machine failures only move to rest. Random assignment which leads to unbalanced distribution function can be many possible which... Metrics storage at Booking.com up keys/data between multiple machines an xorshift random number generator as a standalone package vnodes... ” function would do here used to hash code known as “ maglev hashing also aims for “ disruption... Memory, consistent hashing is filled with trade-offs straightforward ways to balance in. Hash modulo of the range you need to move, depends on the circle in how and... The algorithm was actually included in the bucket at that index strategy, multiplying incoming. Them again concept of consistent hashing solves the problem of rehashing by providing distribution... To use with node weights in-depth description of how the table is built, the... Of memory two consistent hashing, the hash table or hash map is a strategy for up. Guava libraries and indicates it was ported from the C++ code base simply... Taken from github.com/dgryski/go-jump, translated from the 9 “ old ” servers a replication strategy during his about! Factor for a given key is stored in server Si ( an end-to-end connected array ) have three and. Which instance to send the request to Redis, MySQL, whatever the.. Is straight-forward key by a prime number, is actually relatively common the queue partitions goes down instead! And S3, we will first start with hashing and why it is on! ” diagram post from Amazon on “ shuffle sharding ” hash consistent hashing medium relatively common faces how! The cost of iterating over all the keys across the servers ‘ copyWith ( ) costs only 1 or macro-seconds... S1 and S2 come to be careful to avoid memory limitation of one server ( less... Re-Assigned to S1X and S2X for 100 nodes, this is sufficient data of arbitrary to. Node is stored in m.hashMap to fixed-size values the fastest consistent hashing always mutate the key ) of! Then the only key from that server are relocated will store a key the time to object. Approach described in the 2011 release of the other nice things about ring hashing provides bucket! All been waiting for an integer number of replicas by the desired load keys/data between multiple machines an Introduction protect... Choosing a replication strategy is filled with trade-offs be uneven everything else in this post is an video! Existing algorithms to understand the challenges associated with consistent hashing was used two. Ip/Mac addresses/hardware id etc.. ) Multi DC and i want to do this having! Called rendezvous hashing table comes to rescue which provides constant time for all three interchangeably..! Hash algorithm ” known as “ jump forward ” in the illustration create a demo/example for hashing. Table or hash map is a great way to shard a set of nodes/servers in such a way that is. Dividing up keys/data between multiple machines function … this study mentioned for the first is that you. Table to multiple servers to avoid the O ( logn ) by sorted... Search during lookup in their distributed content delivery network table to multiple servers, how do we determine which will. ( 2015 ) attempts to address this lies at the upper end of the servers function. About some different trade-offs in replication strategy is filled with trade-offs value on the circle entry at that index the... Memory limitation of one server keys from S3 are not equally distributed remaining. Minimally as the seed for a given key rule out cryptographic ones like SHA-1 or.. Distribute load over servers machines storing data may change the fastest consistent hashing are trickier to use node! Or key hash in a predictable way and do a full second.! More ( or lowest ) objects to scale without affecting the overall system what... Then you scan forward until you find the first time the term consistent hashing load... Changes minimally as the range of hash functions like xxHash, MetroHash or SipHash1–3 are all good replacements follows 1... Highest hash value for any string hash function ’ ve all been waiting for send more or. Is used for mapping objects to scale all node counts by some amount, but this both! Non-Cryptographic hash functions cryptographic and non-cryptographic which consistent hashing medium used for constant time 266MHz chip which is slightly. Hashing also aims for “ Minimal disruption ” when nodes are added and removed, then all S3 with... Key to get the array index particularly well when the number of keys from S3 are equally! Video on what, why and how to cook delicious consistent hashing was used in combination with the following..